Hmmmm...

If the ongoing rivalry is something we must deal with ourselves, why in the world does that thread have 12 pages already, and why is it still up? LOL.

All right, I count three participants in this comment. I never had a 3 way in the Air Force. Case closed. I never had a 3 way at any time, with anyone. Case closed.

Clearly, Harry, you caught the intent of Jamie's comments, because you said you wondered who else I messed around with in the AF.

See how JJ twists words? No, she didn't say that I had a 3 way with that particular guy. But she did imply I had one with someone. And of course, JJ is lying through her teeth.

Again, JJ, why did you try so hard to get James back if you knew that he was "secretly videoing you?" Why send the singing telegram? If James is so creepy and terrible, why were you so desperate to get him back? 

Also, why lie about what I originally accused you of? Why do you add to the story? I'll go back and find the screenshots of exactly how it went down, and then add your recent "additions." 

And doesn't it suck to know that people on Harry's support you ONLY because you don't like me? 

And no, the entire movie cast wasn't invited to F's at Fennboree, and no, I wasn't riding on James's coattails there. So, add this to Jamie's wishlist of reasons why things happen. It was just James, me, F, Jerry the gardner, and Zoe. Oh yeah, and the Wall Street Journal writer, Dan, who's writing a book about the chase. Forrest chose me to speak to him first, and he chose me to be his guide at Fennboree. And after Dan left, it was just me, F, and James relaxing on the back porch. 

I would like to add that I have so much indisputable dirt on Jamie that it would make your head spin. Yet, even though virtually everything she's said about me is a lie, I'm still decent enough to let you all see just enough to prove she's lying. I have every single text ever sent between us, which shows exactly what she told me about James. And the texts are not doctored, as she's claimed. It is impossible to cut and paste on the text import software I used. She thought he was "Spoon" on Dal's and warned me not to talk to him because he would try and make me sign a search "contract," where if I found the TC, no matter where, I'd have to split with him. I have those texts--I can prove everything. Can she prove a SINGLE thing? Does she have ANY evidence to back up ANYTHING she's said? NOPE! 

And the reason why I don't make her look like a complete and utter lying fool is because someone told me I should feel sorry for her.

I will repeat, I NEVER said I had a restraining order on Jamie. Never. And yes, I did file a police report,  and yes, they advised me to talk to blog owners in an effort to block HER from carrying through with HER blackmail there.

Consider these simple questions:

1. What are Jamie's motives for making up these stories? (See answer 2, I wrapped it up more nicely there)

2. When did she start making up these stories? It wasn't when I accused her of hacking--oh no, it was BEFORE, and I have the screenshots to prove it. She used several aliases on CC that even she couldn't keep track of, and "Fred Astaire" was a particularly nasty one. She was also "India." She was also "Superfly." In one barrage of texts, she both admitted and denied being "Fred Astaire." I have the texts--I can prove she was nasty long BEFORE I accused her of hacking. FredAstaire was quite the vulgar "lady." When I called her out on some information privately, she couldn't keep her story straight to save her life. I can't say I'm not tempted to post those text messages. One minute she's FredAstaire, the next minute she isn't...oh my gosh, it was crazy. 

3. Why do her spewing comments pop up so predictably when I post about happy times on my blog? Jealousy, maybe? Maybe you all should start paying a little closer attention to these things...

4. And if we wanna talk about some sexual deviant behavior (which she lied about), I'll just say that although I may have posted a couple letters from F, it's nothing compared to what she said she would do with Forrest for a clue. Woowhee....it was pretty nasty stuff. And she was serious.

All the important people in the chase know the truth, and they know your site is pure National Enquirer. And if you all want to know the truth--if you really care so much that you have to have 13 pages of discussion on the subject--just go back and read the stuff that India and FredAstaire have said in reference to me. Then go read my blog from around the same time. 

Do some research for once instead of just letting that spaghetti stick to you, no questions asked. Some of you are literally covered with that nasty spaghetti. 

And Bet, I may have gone about those emails the wrong way, I can see how I might have just let things slide, but I've never been afraid to stand up for what I believe in--and you can check all my military records to see for yourself (oh, you don't have them--no worries--I can provide some of them--just not the TOP SECRET ones I was ENTRUSTED with. And Bet, you know (I know you do), that I've tried to be fair, even when I don't particularly get along with someone. I removed mentions of you and kpro off my blog comments because they weren't fair. But I guess that's too much for Harry to do, because he doesn't believe in fairness. He, and mdavis, and Presby are simply out for revenge. 

It's sad to think they are so bitter toward me because they think I got them banned. Nothing could be further than the truth, yet they still cling to that even though Stephanie and Old Drum have confirmed that I had no part in it from the start. Bannings are still happening--am I a part of those, too, even though I hardly ever post there anymore? 

Right is right and wrong is wrong, and I have a strong sense of integrity. Especially if I see someone hurting someone I care about.

Jamie says I'm a bad mom. I dare her to say that to Aidan's face. Or Callie's, or Joe's. 

And with that, I believe my work is done.  I'll let Tapatalk make the decision and get back to having a wonderful life. :)